ting—original draft. H.-P.P.: Conceptualization, methodology, writing—review & editing. A.H.: Conceptualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, writing— review & editing. DATA AVAILABILITY Data and source code that support the findings of this study are openly available in the ETH gitlab repository at https://gitlab.ethz.ch/crop_phenotyping/htfp_data_processing and archived in the ETH research collection (http://doi.org/10.5905/ethz-1007-385).LITERATURE CITED Araus JL, Kefauver SC, Zaman-Allah M, Olsen MS, Cairns JE. 2018. Translating high-throughput phenotyping into genetic gain. Trends in Plant Science 23:451–466. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2018.02.001. Bonhomme R. 20
Open resource ↗gitlab.ethz.ch/crop_phenotyping/htfp_data_processing · pdf-raw-page:13 lines:1-88Paper record
Phenomics data processing: extracting dose–response curve parameters from high-resolution temperature courses and repeated field-based wheat height measurements
in silico Plants · 1 Jan 2022 · 10.1093/insilicoplants/diac007
Abstract
Abstract Temperature is a main driver of plant growth and development. New phenotyping tools enable quantifying the temperature response of hundreds of genotypes. Yet, for field-derived data, temperature response modelling bears flaws and pitfalls concerning the interpretation of derived parameters. In this study, climate data from five growing seasons with differing temperature distributions served as starting point for a growth simulation of wheat stem elongation, based on a four-parametric temperature response function (Wang–Engel) including all cardinal temperatures. In a novel approach, we re-extracted dose–responses from the simulation by combining high-resolution (hours) temperature courses with low-resolution (days) height data. The collection of such data is common in field phenotyping platforms. To take advantage of the lack of supra-optimal temperatures during the stem elongation, simpler (linear and asymptotic) models to predict temperature response parameters were investigated. The asymptotic model extracted the base temperature of growth and the maximum absolute growth rate with high precision, whereas simpler, linear models failed to do so. Additionally, the asymptotic model provided a proxy estimate for the optimum temperature. However, when including seasonally changing cardinal temperatures, the prediction accuracy of the asymptotic model was strongly reduced. In a field study with three winter wheat varieties, significant differences were found for all three asymptotic dose–response curve parameters. We conclude that the asymptotic model based on high-resolution temperature courses is suitable to extract meaningful parameters from field-based data.
Code and data availability
The paper's Data Availability statement explicitly deposits the source code supporting its phenotyping analysis (dose–response extraction from wheat height and temperature data) in a public ETH GitLab repository, archived in the ETH Research Collection with a DOI. Both URLs are allowed and the repository/identifier ver
ation, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, writing— review & editing. DATA AVAILABILITY Data and source code that support the findings of this study are openly available in the ETH gitlab repository at https://gitlab.ethz.ch/crop_phenotyping/htfp_data_processing and archived in the ETH research collection (http://doi.org/10.5905/ethz-1007-385).LITERATURE CITED Araus JL, Kefauver SC, Zaman-Allah M, Olsen MS, Cairns JE. 2018. Translating high-throughput phenotyping into genetic gain. Trends in Plant Science 23:451–466. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2018.02.001. Bonhomme R. 2000. Bases and limits to using ‘degree.day’ units. European Journal of Agronomy 13:1–10. doi:10.1016/ S
Open resource ↗10.5905/ethz-1007-385 · pdf-raw-page:13 lines:1-88