The data used in this study were obtained from the publicly available greenhouse tomato gas-exchange dataset reported by Manjarrez-Sanchez and Martinez-Carrillo [29].
Open resource ↗pdf-raw-page:4 lines:1-38Paper record
Cross-Session Reconstruction and Environmental Limitation Screening of Greenhouse Tomato Leaf Photosynthesis from Gas-Exchange Data Using a CatBoost–ExtraTrees–RBF-SVR Stacked Ensemble
AgriEngineering · 10 Sept 2026 · 10.3390/agriengineering8090383
Abstract
Reliable prediction and interpretation of photosynthetic rate are important for precision environmental management in greenhouse tomato production, but model stability is often limited by variable redundancy, measurement-session effects, and environmental heterogeneity. This study developed an integrated gas-exchange-data-based framework for key-factor selection, photosynthetic-rate reconstruction, cross-session validation, environmental correction, and physiology-informed limitation screening. Core predictors were first identified from high-dimensional gas-exchange variables using K-means clustering and random-forest importance analysis. A CatBoost–ExtraTrees–RBF-SVR stacked ensemble was then constructed to reconstruct the leaf photosynthetic rate from selected gas-exchange variables, and its cross-session generalization was evaluated using nested cross-validation and leave-one-file-out (LOFO) extrapolation. Environmental correction was further applied to improve cross-session comparability, and rule-based limitation screening was used to classify potential environmental constraints associated with reduced photosynthesis. The stacked model achieved an RMSE of 0.806 and an R2 of 0.9918 under nested cross-validation, and an RMSE of 0.814 and an R2 of 0.9917 under LOFO extrapolation. After environmental correction, the cross-session variability of the environmentally corrected photosynthetic indicator was reduced by 96.0%, reflecting improved cross-session comparability. Under deployable sensor inputs, performance decreased markedly (A1: RMSE = 4.578, R2 = 0.735; A2: RMSE = 4.610, R2 = 0.731), compared with the gas-exchange baseline (RMSE = 0.833, R2 = 0.991). Thus, routine greenhouse sensor models should be regarded as approximate rather than high-accuracy substitutes for the gas-exchange-based model.
Code and data availability