ins, CO 80526, USA. Data Availability All data used in this study are available for download from the supplemental information as a CSV file (sup_data_all_dendro.csv). All software needed for operating sensors, 3D prints, photos, and schematics have been included in the SI materials, and can also be freely accessed via github ( https://github.com/sean-gl/dendrometer_water_potential_device ). Sources of Funding J.J.S. was supported by an NSF Postdoctoral Research Fellowship in Biology, Grant No. IOS-1907338. Contributions by the Authors All authors contributed meaningfully to the manuscript. S.M.G., J.J.S., B.A., S.K.P. and J.M. designed the experiment and collected the data. S.M.G. wrote the
Open resource ↗https://github.com/sean-gl/dendrometer_water_potential_device · lines:224-283Paper record
Development and application of an inexpensive open-source dendrometer for detecting xylem water potential and radial stem growth at high spatial and temporal resolution.
AoB PLANTS · 28 Feb 2024 · 10.1093/aobpla/plae009
Abstract
There is currently a need for inexpensive, continuous, non-destructive water potential measurements at high temporal resolution ( Helianthus annuus ) (petioles and stems) and a monocotyledon ( Zea mays ) species (stems) for 1 week during dehydration and re-watering treatments under laboratory conditions. We also demonstrated the ability of the device to record branch and trunk diameter variation of a woody dicotyledon ( Rhus typhina ) in the field. Under laboratory conditions, we compared our device (hereafter 'contact' dendrometer) with modified versions of another open-source dendrometer (the 'optical' dendrometer). Overall, contact and optical dendrometers were well aligned with one another, with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.77 to 0.97. Both dendrometer devices were well aligned with direct measurements of xylem water potential, with calibration curves exhibiting significant non-linearity, especially at water potentials near the point of incipient plasmolysis, with pseudo R 2 values (Efron) ranging from 0.89 to 0.99. Overall, both dendrometers were comparable and provided sufficient resolution to detect subtle differences in stem water potential (ca. 50 kPa) resulting from light-induced changes in transpiration, vapour pressure deficit and drying/wetting soils. All hardware designs, alternative configurations, software and build instructions for the contact dendrometers are provided.
Code and data availability