.D.B.; validation, Mathew Horak and W.D.B.; visualization, A.P. and N.M.; writing—original draft, A.P., N.M., M.H. and W.D.B.; writing—review and editing, M.H. and W.D.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research received no external funding. Data Availability Statement: https://www.kaggle.com/c/plant-pathology-2020-fgvc7 (accessed on 8 August 2022). Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. References 1. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: International Plant Protection Convention. Available online: https://www.fao.org/plant-health-2020/about/en (accessed on 17 September 2022). 2. B
Open resource ↗Kaggle · plant-pathology-2020-fgvc7 · pdf-raw-page:12 lines:1-52Paper record
A Two-Step Machine Learning Approach for Crop Disease Detection Using GAN and UAV Technology
Remote Sensing · 23 Sept 2022 · 10.3390/rs14194765
Abstract
Automated plant diagnosis is a technology that promises large increases in cost-efficiency for agriculture. However, multiple problems reduce the effectiveness of drones, including the inverse relationship between resolution and speed and the lack of adequate labeled training data. This paper presents a two-step machine learning approach that analyzes low-fidelity and high-fidelity images in sequence, preserving efficiency as well as accuracy. Two data-generators are also used to minimize class imbalance in the high-fidelity dataset and to produce low-fidelity data that are representative of UAV images. The analysis of applications and methods is conducted on a database of high-fidelity apple tree images which are corrupted with class imbalance. The application begins by generating high-fidelity data using generative networks and then uses these novel data alongside the original high-fidelity data to produce low-fidelity images. A machine learning identifier identifies plants and labels them as potentially diseased or not. A machine learning classifier is then given the potentially diseased plant images and returns actual diagnoses for these plants. The results show an accuracy of 96.3% for the high-fidelity system and a 75.5% confidence level for our low-fidelity system. Our drone technology shows promising results in accuracy when compared to labor-based methods of diagnosis.
Code and data availability