← Papers

Paper record

Geometric Morphometric Versus Genomic Patterns in a Large Polyploid Plant Species Complex.

Hodač L, Karbstein K, Tomasello S, Wäldchen J, Bradican JP, Hörandl E.

Biology · 9 Mar 2023 · 10.3390/biology12030418

Abstract

Plant species complexes represent a particularly interesting example of taxonomically complex groups (TCGs), linking hybridization, apomixis, and polyploidy with complex morphological patterns. In such TCGs, mosaic-like character combinations and conflicts of morphological data with molecular phylogenies present a major problem for species classification. Here, we used the large polyploid apomictic European Ranunculus auricomus complex to study relationships among five diploid sexual progenitor species and 75 polyploid apomictic derivate taxa, based on geometric morphometrics using 11,690 landmarked objects (basal and stem leaves, receptacles), genomic data (97,312 RAD-Seq loci, 48 phased target enrichment genes, 71 plastid regions) from 220 populations. We showed that (1) observed genomic clusters correspond to morphological groupings based on basal leaves and concatenated traits, and morphological groups were best resolved with RAD-Seq data; (2) described apomictic taxa usually overlap within trait morphospace except for those taxa at the space edges; (3) apomictic phenotypes are highly influenced by parental subgenome composition and to a lesser extent by climatic factors; and (4) allopolyploid apomictic taxa, compared to their sexual progenitor, resemble a mosaic of ecological and morphological intermediate to transgressive biotypes. The joint evaluation of phylogenomic, phenotypic, reproductive, and ecological data supports a revision of purely descriptive, subjective traditional morphological classifications.

Code and data availability

The paper's geometric morphometric phenotyping inputs (leaf/receptacle images and landmark files) are publicly deposited on FigShare, directly reproducing this paper's plant-phenotyping measurements. Flow cytometric ploidy/reproduction-mode data and the MDPI supplement with morphometric tables are also paper-specific;

Datasetpublic

3), respectively. More detailed data, tables, and figures concerning (phylo)genomic analyses are deposited on FigShare ( https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14046305 ) (accessed on 7 March 2023). Flow cytometric (FC) and flow cytometric seed screening (FCSS) data (ploidy levels, reproduction modes) are also stored in Figshare ( https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13352429 ) (accessed on 7 March 2023). We deposited image data processed for geometric morphometric analyses on FigShare upon publication ( https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21393375 ) (accessed on 31 January 2023). Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Funding Statement This research was funded by the

Open resource ↗FigShare · 10.6084/m9.figshare.13352429 · lines:135-158
Supplementpublic

e thank Esther Philine Zieschang, Anne-Sophie Burmeister, and Jennifer Krüger for processing leaf scans for geometric morphometric analyses, and Michael Kloster for providing scripts to automatically cut leaf scans into basal and stem leaf parts. Supplementary Materials The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology12030418/s1 , Figure S1: Landmark digitization of the taxonomically most informative Ranunculus auricomus traits; Figure S2: Correlation plot concerning non-autocorrelated (r < 0.8), standardized (0 mean, unit variance) abiotic environmental factors; Figure S3: Correlation plot concerning standardized axis shape scores of al

Open resource ↗lines:122-134