Genomic prediction vs. gene-based crop models: a case study on rice trait prediction.

Abstract

Conventional breeding for ideotypes in target environments remains challenging due to genotype-by-environment interactions and the genetic complexity of key agronomic traits. Traditional multi-environment field trials are costly and time-consuming, limiting rapid genetic gain. These challenges highlight the need for digital tools to support rice breeding. However, two major approaches, genomic prediction (GP) and gene-based crop models (GBCMs), have distinct advantages. In this study, a dataset derived from a natural rice population comprising 210 genotypes, genotyped with about 650,000 markers, rice dry matter, and yield across three environments, was used to develop two genomic prediction models, genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and a convolutional neural network (CNN), together with a gene-based crop modeling framework. The effectiveness of these models in predicting rice traits and assisting in breeding selection was subsequently evaluated. Prediction results indicated that biomass and yield could be effectively predicted by all models, with Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) values ranging from 10.60% to 18.59% and 9.93% to 18.19%, respectively. In terms of predictive accuracy, parameter-based crop models achieved the highest predictive accuracy, although it was confined to theoretical simulations. This was followed by the GBCM and CNN, whereas the GBLUP exhibited the lowest performance. Furthermore, GGE biplot analysis revealed the predictions of the GBCM aligned more closely with field observations than those of the CNN, emphasizing the potential of GBCM as a practical surrogate for digital breeding. These results provide valuable insights into modeling genotype-by-environment interactions and support the development of data-informed breeding strategies for future rice improvement.

Code and data availability

The article states its rice phenotype/genotype dataset and models are not publicly deposited; data are available only upon request. No public code, dataset, or model repository is provided.

No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.