Rapid Size-Dependent Impact of Cu and CuO Nanoparticles on Lentil Seeds and Leaves Using Biospeckle Optical Coherence Tomography.

Abstract

Significant concerns regarding the impact of copper (Cu) and copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles (NPs) and microparticles (MPs) on plant systems have been brought to light through the growing use of these materials in industry and agriculture. The properties of NPs are critical in determining their uptake by plant cells and the ensuing effects on plant physiology. This emphasizes the need for accurate monitoring techniques to determine the impact caused by NPs on seed development and plant growth. This study uses foliar exposure at 0 and 100 mg/L, as well as seed exposure at 0, 25, and 100 mg/L, to explore the effects of Cu ( Lens culinaris ). Biospeckle optical coherence tomography (bOCT) was employed to monitor internal physiological activity in real time, non-invasively-capabilities that static imaging methods, such as OCT, are unable to provide. Results showed that exposure to Cu and CuO NPs led to significant reductions in biospeckle contrast, indicating heightened physiological stress, while MPs generally produced minimal or even positive effects. These early changes detected by bOCT within just 6 h of exposure were consistent with traditional morphological and biochemical assessments-such as germination rate, growth, biomass, and catalase activity-that typically require several days to detect. The study demonstrates that bOCT enables the rapid, functional assessment of nanomaterial effects, including those resulting from foliar exposure, thereby offering a powerful tool for early and non-destructive evaluation of plant responses to engineered particles in agricultural contexts.

Code and data availability

The paper describes bOCT imaging of lentil seeds/leaves and conventional phenotyping, but provides no public dataset, image repository, or code deposit. The Data Availability Statement says data are only available on request, and no authors' public URL is given, so no qualifying paper-specific asset can be identified.

No evidence-backed public reproduction asset is currently recorded.