← PhenoPaper

Paper discovery

Plant phenotyping methods.

植物形質を測っただけの研究ではなく、フェノタイピング手法の開発・検証・実質的利用・ベンチマーク・方法レビューとの関連性が見つかった論文を中心に表示します。

表示条件: Chia条件を解除 ×
2 papers · plant phenotyping relevance matchLatest completed run · 2016-01-01 – 2026-09-15
Plant phenotyping relevance matchCrossref · Europe PMC · checked 14 Sept 2026
Published31 Aug 2026Journal of the Science of Food and AgricultureCited by 0 · OpenAlex ↗

Image‐based and biochemical multimodal phenotyping for explainable classification of chia ( Salvia hispanica L.) genotypes

Sevim Akcura · Irem Poyraz · Beyza Ciftci · Mahmut Kaplan

ChiaRGB / grayscaleSeed / grainClassificationPigment / colour / senescenceFruit / seed / panicle traits

Abstract BACKGROUND This study developed an explainable machine learning framework integrating morphological, color, and biochemical characteristics for classifying chia ( Salvia hispanica L.) genotypes. A dataset was assembled from 1200 seed images spanning four genotypes, from which 17 morphological and color features were extracted. These were complemented by six sample‐level biochemical traits – crude protein, fat, ash, fiber, carbohydrate, and total sugar – obtained from the corresponding experimental‐unit seed sample, resulting in a total of 23 variables in the integrated dataset. The dataset was evaluated comparatively with 10 machine learning algorithms under repeated 10‐fold cross‐validation, with all preprocessing confined to each training fold to avoid data leakage. RESULTS The highest performance was obtained with XGBoost, reaching 86.99% accuracy, a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.820, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area of 0.975, and a precision–recall curve (PRC) area of 0.933; Simple Logistic followed closely at 86.85% accuracy, with comparable ROC and PRC areas (0.974 and 0.933). Significant differences among the algorithms were confirmed by the Friedman test ( P = 2.47 × 10 −120 ), with post hoc comparisons placing XGBoost and Simple Logistic within the same top‐performing group. Protein, fiber, ash, and fat were the most influential biochemical traits, while hue and saturation among color parameters and shape index and geometric mean diameter among morphological features also contributed appreciably. The G1 genotype, which showed comparatively high protein (27.62%) and fiber (40.62%) contents, was the most consistently distinguished class, with XGBoost and Simple Logistic achieving F‐measures of 0.954 and 0.955, respectively, whereas greater phenotypic overlap between G2 and G3 resulted in more frequent mutual misclassifications. CONCLUSION These findings indicate that multimodal phenotyping, coupled with explainable machine learning, offers a practical and biologically interpretable decision‐support approach for chia genotype classification. © 2026 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Plant phenotyping relevance matchCrossref · Europe PMC · checked 7 Sept 2026
Published12 Apr 2024PlantsCited by 9 · OpenAlex ↗

Monitoring Plant Height and Spatial Distribution of Biometrics with a Low-Cost Proximal Platform

Giovanni Bitella · Rocco Bochicchio · Donato Castronuovo · Stella Lovelli · Giuseppe Mercurio · Anna Rita Rivelli · Leonardo Rosati · Paola D’Antonio · Pierluigi Casiero · Gaetano Laghetti · Mariana Amato · Roberta Rossi

Alfalfa / lucerneChiaFaba beanWheatField / plotLaboratory / benchtopLeafWhole plant / canopy / plot / fieldMorphology / geometry measurementBiomass / plant weight

Measuring canopy height is important for phenotyping as it has been identified as the most relevant parameter for the fast determination of plant mass and carbon stock, as well as crop responses and their spatial variability. In this work, we develop a low-cost tool for measuring plant height proximally based on an ultrasound sensor for flexible use in static or on-the-go mode. The tool was lab-tested and field-tested on crop systems of different geometry and spacings: in a static setting on faba bean (Vicia faba L.) and in an on-the-go setting on chia (Salvia hispanica L.), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), and wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Cross-correlation (CC) or a dynamic time-warping algorithm (DTW) was used to analyze and correct shifts between manual and sensor data in chia. Sensor data were able to reproduce with minor shifts in canopy profile and plant status indicators in the field when plant heights varied gradually in narrow-spaced chia (R2 = 0.98), faba bean (R2 = 0.96), and wheat (R2 = up to 0.99). Abrupt height changes resulted in systematic errors in height estimation, and short-scale variations were not well reproduced (e.g., R2 in widely spaced chia was 0.57 to 0.66 after shifting based on CC or DTW, respectively)). In alfalfa, ultrasound data were a better predictor than NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) for Leaf Area Index and biomass (R2 from 0.81 to 0.84). Maps of ultrasound-determined height showed that clusters were useful for spatial management. The good performance of the tool both in a static setting and in the on-the-go setting provides flexibility for the determination of plant height and spatial variation of plant responses in different conditions from natural to managed systems.